POTATOCORE · ICP William Hale — the enterprise validator SIMULATION
Ladder
Search
Share a considered take…
🎥 Video🖼️ Media✍️ Write article
William Hale
VP, Strategy & Corporate Development
2w · 🌎
+ Follow

I run point on the initiatives that are too big to get wrong. Twenty years of it taught me one thing: the smartest move is knowing what you don't know — and bringing in a straight second opinion before you commit the org. I move deliberately. When I move, I've done the work.

👍💡 31247 comments · 9 reposts
Marcus Okonkwo
CFO · a mid-size lender
3d · 🌎
+ Follow

Everyone's racing to bolt "AI" onto their roadmap this quarter. The board wants a number by Friday. Curious how other strategy leads are pressure-testing these bets before committing real capital.

👍 8821 comments
William Hale · VP, Strategy

Write the failure case down before the capital call, not after. If nobody in the room can articulate how this goes wrong, you haven't evaluated it yet — you've fallen for it. I gate anything irreversible on an independent read.

3d · Like · 34 · Reply
Marcus Okonkwo

This is why I bring you the hard ones, William.

3d · Like · Reply
William Hale
VP, Strategy & Corporate Development
1w · 🌎
+ Follow

Worth the read. Being right about a 'no' is quieter than being right about a 'yes' — but it's the same judgment.

Ladder Article
The Defensible Decision: Why the Best Strategy Calls Look Boring in Hindsightwilliamhale.co · 8 min read
👍💡 17619 comments
Potatocore (Brett)
Naming the downside case, on camera
4d · 🌎
+ Follow

New one is up. I walk through where this operating system actually breaks — the three failure modes nobody selling AI will tell you about, and how to tell if you're one of them. If it doesn't fit your shop, I'll say so.

▶ Potatocore · Video 4
The business operating system — and the three ways it failspotatocore.mp4 · 14 min
👍💡 612 comments
William Hale · VP, Strategy

Rare to see someone name the downside case unprompted. That's the tell of a real operator, not a vendor. Noted.

4d · Like · 42 · Reply
Potatocore (Brett)

Appreciate it. Naming where it fails is the whole job — happy to talk if you ever want a straight second opinion on something already in motion.

4d · Like · Reply
William Hale ✉ Potatocore
Private message · surfaced for this study
2d

I've watched what you've done for a few smaller shops and did some checking — the outcomes hold up under a look. I'm not shopping for an implementer. I have a multi-year initiative already in motion that the org is about to commit to, and I want an independent read on it: where it fails, what I'm not seeing, whether it's defensible. Do you take that kind of validation engagement? I move slowly, but I don't waste people's time once I do.

Sent · Read
Potatocore (Brett)

That's exactly the work — a scoped second opinion, the downside named, a call you can stand behind. No build, no lock-in. Let's put a bounded engagement around it and I'll tell you the truth, including if the truth is don't.

2d · Read
William Hale

Good. That's the answer I was hoping for and rarely get. Send scope.

2d · Sent